<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NIVEL international publications - Netherlands institute for health services research</title>
<link>http://www.nivel.nl</link>
<description>The latest international publications from NIVEL</description>
<generator>Nivel Adlib feed generator</generator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 12 10:11:44 +0100</pubDate><item>
<title>Child and adolescent mental health care in Dutch general practice: time trend analyses.</title>
<link>http://nvl002.nivel.nl/adlibweb/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&amp;database=ChoicePublicat&amp;search=priref=4228</link><author>library@nivel.nl</author><description><![CDATA[Zwaanswijk, M.; Dijk, C. van; Verheij, R.A.; <br /><br />Background: Because most children and adolescents visit their general practitioner (GP) regularly, general practice is a useful setting in which child and adolescent mental health problems can be identified, treated or referred to specialised care. Measures to strengthen Dutch primary mental health care have stimulated cooperation between primary and secondary mental health care and have led to an increase in the provision of social workers and primary care psychologists. These measures may have affected GPs’ roles in child and adolescent mental health care. This study aims to investigate the identification and treatment of child and adolescent mental health problems in general practice over a five-year period (2004-2008). Methods: Data of patients aged 0-18 years (N ranging from 37716 to 73432) were derived from electronic medical records of 42-82 Dutch general practices. Time trends in the prevalence of recorded mental health problems, prescriptions for psychotropic medication, and referrals to primary and secondary mental health care were analysed. Results: In 2008, 6.6% of children and 7.5% of adolescents were recorded as having mental health problems; 15.2% of these children and 29.4% of these adolescents were prescribed psychotropic medication; 18.9% of these children and 22.9% of these adolescents were referred, mainly to secondary mental health care. Between 2004 and 2008, the percentages of children (chi-square: 22.06; p<0.001) and adolescents (chisquare: 9.15; p=0.003) who were diagnosed with mental health problems increased. An increase was also found in the percentage of children who were prescribed psychostimulants (chi-square: 8.29; p=0.004). Prescriptions for antidepressants decreased over time in both age groups (children: chi-square: 6.80; p=0.009; adolescents: chi-square: 13.52; p<0.001). The percentages of children who were referred to primary (chi-square: 6.98; p=0.008) and secondary mental health care (chisquare: 5.76; p=0.02) increased over the years, whereas no significant increase was found for adolescents. Conclusions: Although GPs’ identification of mental health problems and referrals to primary mental health care have increased, most referrals are still made to secondary care. To further strengthen primary mental health care, effective short-term interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems that can be applied in general practice need to be developed. (aut. ref.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 12 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Influenza A(H1N1) oseltamivir resistant viruses in the Netherlands during the winter 2007/2008.</title>
<link>http://nvl002.nivel.nl/adlibweb/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&amp;database=ChoicePublicat&amp;search=priref=4471</link><author>library@nivel.nl</author><description><![CDATA[Dijkstra, F.; Jonges, M.; Beek, R. van; Donker, G.A.; Schellevis, F.G.; Koopmans, M.; Sande, M.A.B. van der; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Boucher, C.A.B.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Meijer, A.; <br /><br />Background: Antiviral susceptibility surveillance in the Netherlands was intensified after the first reports about the emergence of influenza A(H1N1) oseltamivir resistant viruses in Norway in January, 2008. Methods: Within the existing influenza surveillance an additional questionnaire study was performed to retrospectively assess possible risk factors and establish clinical outcome of all patients with influenza virus A(H1N1) positive specimens. To discriminate resistant and sensitive viruses, fifty percent inhibitory concentrations for the neuramidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir were determined in a neuraminidase inhibition assay. Mutations previously associated with resistance to neuramidase inhibitors and M2 blockers (amantadine and rimantadine) were searched for by nucleotide sequencing of neuraminidase and M2 genes respectively. Results: Among 171 patients infected with A(H1N1) viruses an overall prevalence of oseltamivi resistance of 27% (95% CI: 20-34%) was found. None of influenza A(H1N1) oseltamivir resistant viruses tested was resistant against amantadine or zanamivir. Patient characteristics, underlying conditions, influenza vaccination, symptoms, complications, and exposure to oseltamivir and other antivirals did not differ significantly between patients infected with resistant and sensitive A(H1N1) viruses. Conclusion: In 2007/2008 a large proportion of influenza A(H1N1) viruses resistant to oseltamivir was detected. There were no clinical differences between patients infected with resistant and sensitive A(H1N1) viruses. Continuous monitoring of the antiviral drug sensitivity profile of influenza viruses is justified, preferably using the existing sentinel surveillance, however, complemented with data from the more severe end of the clinical spectrum. In order to act timely on emergencies of public health importance we suggest setting up a surveillance system that can guarantee rapid access to the latter. (aut. ref.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 12 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Childhood nonspecific abdominal pain in family practice: incidence, associated factors, and management.</title>
<link>http://nvl002.nivel.nl/adlibweb/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&amp;database=ChoicePublicat&amp;search=priref=3582</link><author>library@nivel.nl</author><description><![CDATA[Gieteling, M.; Lisman-van Leeuwen, Y.; Wouden, J.C. van der; Schellevis, F.G.; Berger, M.Y.; <br /><br />PURPOSE: Nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) is a common complaint in childhood. In specialist care, childhood NSAP is considered to be a complex and time-consuming problem, and parents are hard to reassure. Little is known about NSAP in family practice, but the impression is that family physicians consider it to be a benign syndrome needing little more than reassurance. This discrepancy calls for a better understanding of NSAP in family practice. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (2001). Using registration data of 91 family practices, we identified children aged 4 to 17 years with NSAP. We calculated the incidence, and we studied factors associated with childhood NSAP, referrals, and prescriptions. RESULTS: The incidence of NSAP was 25.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7-26.3) per 1,000 person years. Most children (92.7%) with newly diagnosed NSAP (N = 1,480) consulted their doctor for this condition once or twice. Factors independently associated with NSAP were female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5), nongastrointestinal-nonspecific somatic symptoms (OR = 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5), and health care use (OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05). When NSAP was diagnosed at the first visit, 3% of the patients were referred to specialist care, and 1% received additional testing. Family physicians prescribed medication in 21.3% of the visits for NSAP. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood NSAP is a common problem in family practice. Most patients visit their doctor once or twice for this problem. Family physicians use little additional testing and make few referrals in their management of childhood NSAP. Despite the lack of evidence for effectiveness, family physicians commonly prescribe medication for NSAP. (aut. ref.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 12 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Impact of dizziness on everyday life in older primary care patients: a cross-sectional study.</title>
<link>http://nvl002.nivel.nl/adlibweb/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&amp;database=ChoicePublicat&amp;search=priref=4029</link><author>library@nivel.nl</author><description><![CDATA[Dros, J.; Maarsingh, O.R.; Beem, L.; Horst, H.E. van der; Riet, G. ter; Schellevis, F.G.; Weert, H.C.P.M. van; <br /><br />Background: Dizziness is a common and often disabling symptom, but diagnosis often remains unclear; especially in older persons where dizziness tends to be multicausal. Research on dizziness-related impairment might provide options for a functional oriented approach, with less focus on finding diagnoses. We therefore studied dizziness-related impairment in older primary care patients and aimed to identify indicators related to this impairment. Methods: In a cross-sectional study we included 417 consecutive patients of 65 years and older presenting with dizziness to 45 general practitioners in the Netherlands from July 2006 to January 2008. We performed tests, including patient history, and physical and additional examination, previously selected by an international expert panel and based on an earlier systematic review. Our primary outcome was impact of dizziness on everyday life measured with the Dutch validated version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). After a bootstrap procedure (1500x) we investigated predictability of DHI-scores with stepwise backward multiple linear and logistic regressions. Results: DHI-scores varied from 0 to 88 (maximum score: 100) and 60% of patients experienced moderate or severe impact on everyday life due to dizziness. Indicators for dizziness-related impairment were: onset of dizziness 6 months ago or more (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.7), frequency of dizziness at least daily (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0-5.4), duration of dizziness episode one minute or less (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.9), presence of anxiety and/or depressive disorder (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.2-8.8), use of sedative drugs (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.8) , and impaired functional mobility (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-4.2). For this model with only 6 indicators the AUC was .80 (95% CI .76-.84). Conclusions: Dizziness-related impairment in older primary care patients is considerable (60%). With six simple indicators it is possible to identify which patients suffer the most from their dizziness without exactly knowing the cause(s) of their dizziness. Influencing these indicators, if possible, may lead to functional improvement and this might be effective in patients with moderate or severe impact of dizziness on their daily lives. (aut.ref.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 12 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vitality and the course of limitations in activities in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.</title>
<link>http://nvl002.nivel.nl/adlibweb/dispatcher.aspx?action=search&amp;database=ChoicePublicat&amp;search=priref=3980</link><author>library@nivel.nl</author><description><![CDATA[Dijk, G.M. van; Veenhof, C.; Lankhorst, G.J.; Ende, C.H.M. van den; Dekker, J.; <br /><br />Background: The objective of the study was to determine whether psychological and social factors predict the course of limitations in activities in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, in addition to established somatic and cognitive risk factors. Methods: A longitudinal cohort study with a follow-up period of three years was conducted. Patients (N = 237) with hip or knee osteoarthritis were recruited from rehabilitation centers and hospitals. Body functions, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, limitations in activities and psychological and social factors (mental health, vitality, pain coping and perceived social support) were assessed. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Psychological and social factors were added to a previously developed model with body functions, comorbidity and cognitive functioning. Results: In knee OA, low vitality has a negative impact on the course of self-reported and performance-based limitations in activities, after controlling for somatic and cognitive factors. In hip OA, psychological and social factors had no additional contribution to the model. Conclusion: Low vitality predicts deterioration of limitations in activities in elderly patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, in addition to established somatic and cognitive risk factors. However, the contribution of vitality is relatively small. Results of this study are relevant for the group of patients with knee or hip OA, attending hospitals and rehabilitation centers. (aut. ref.)]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 12 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

