Senior researcher General Practice Care
Publicatie
Publication date
The efficacy of Le Bon Départ and Sensory Integration treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized study with six single cases.
Leemrijse, C., Meijer, O.G., Vermeer, A., Ader, H.J., Diemel, S. The efficacy of Le Bon Départ and Sensory Integration treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder: a randomized study with six single cases. Clinical Rehabilitation: 2000, 14(3), p. 247-259.
Download the PDF
Objective: evaluation of the efficacy of Le Bon Départ (LBD) treatment and Sensory Integration (SI) treatment on motor performance on children with developmental coordination disorder. Design: a single subject design with multiple baseline and alternating treatments. Order of treatment and lenght of phase were randomized. Measurements were blinded. Setting: department of Occupational Therapy at the Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Subjects: five boys and one girl with developmental coordination disorder (age: 6.0-8.1 years). Interventions: baseline condition, Le Bon Départ treatment and Secondary Integration treatment. Main outcome measures: the Movement ABC, Praxis Tests, a rhythm test and visual analogue scales. With the exception of the Praxis Tests, lower scores indicate better performance. Results: during both treatments, the performance on the Movement ABC (x = 7.21) and the scores on the visual analogue scales (x = 46.64) were significantly better than in the baseline (Movement ABC baseline: x = 17.38; visual analogue scales baseline: x = 68.18). After treatment 2, performance on the Praxis Tests and scores on the visual analogue scales were significantly better than after treatment 1 (Praxis Tests: 113.54 versus 104.68; visual analogue scales: 34.74 versus 58.54). All six children performed better on the Movement ABC during treatment as compared to the baseline. Le Bon Départ led to significant improvement on all dependent variables, Sensory Integration on the visual analogue scales only. The improvement after Le Bon Départ were larger than the improvement after Sensory Integration treatment. On the rhythm test this difference was significant: LBD led to an improvement of 43.01 points, while the improvement after SI was 17.59 points (p < 0.53). Conclusion: motor performance of children with developmental coordination disorder improved significantly on all dependent variables after the combination of treatments. Le Bon Départ led to more improvement than Sensory Integration. LBD appears to be a valuable treatment method for children with developmental coordination disorder. (aut.ref.)
Objective: evaluation of the efficacy of Le Bon Départ (LBD) treatment and Sensory Integration (SI) treatment on motor performance on children with developmental coordination disorder. Design: a single subject design with multiple baseline and alternating treatments. Order of treatment and lenght of phase were randomized. Measurements were blinded. Setting: department of Occupational Therapy at the Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Subjects: five boys and one girl with developmental coordination disorder (age: 6.0-8.1 years). Interventions: baseline condition, Le Bon Départ treatment and Secondary Integration treatment. Main outcome measures: the Movement ABC, Praxis Tests, a rhythm test and visual analogue scales. With the exception of the Praxis Tests, lower scores indicate better performance. Results: during both treatments, the performance on the Movement ABC (x = 7.21) and the scores on the visual analogue scales (x = 46.64) were significantly better than in the baseline (Movement ABC baseline: x = 17.38; visual analogue scales baseline: x = 68.18). After treatment 2, performance on the Praxis Tests and scores on the visual analogue scales were significantly better than after treatment 1 (Praxis Tests: 113.54 versus 104.68; visual analogue scales: 34.74 versus 58.54). All six children performed better on the Movement ABC during treatment as compared to the baseline. Le Bon Départ led to significant improvement on all dependent variables, Sensory Integration on the visual analogue scales only. The improvement after Le Bon Départ were larger than the improvement after Sensory Integration treatment. On the rhythm test this difference was significant: LBD led to an improvement of 43.01 points, while the improvement after SI was 17.59 points (p < 0.53). Conclusion: motor performance of children with developmental coordination disorder improved significantly on all dependent variables after the combination of treatments. Le Bon Départ led to more improvement than Sensory Integration. LBD appears to be a valuable treatment method for children with developmental coordination disorder. (aut.ref.)