Programmaleider Communicatie in de Gezondheidszorg; bijzonder hoogleraar 'Communicatie in de gezondheidszorg', Radboudumc
Publicatie
Publicatie datum
Clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ verbal and nonverbal communication during prenatal counseling for anomaly screening.
Martin, L., Gitsels-van der Wal, J.T., Pereboom, M.T.R., Spelten, E.R., Hutton, E.K., Dulmen, S. van. Clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ verbal and nonverbal communication during prenatal counseling for anomaly screening. Patient Education and Counseling: 2016, 99(1), p. 85-91.
Lees online
Objectives
This study focuses on facilitation of clients’ psychosocial communication during prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly screening. We assessed how psychosocial communication by clients is related to midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Methods
During 184 videotaped prenatal counseling consultations with 20 Dutch midwives, verbal psychosocial and affective behavior was measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). We rated the duration of client-directed gaze. We performed multilevel analyses to assess the relation between clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Results
Clients’ psychosocial communication was higher if midwives’ asked more psychosocial questions and showed more affective behavior (b = 0.90; CI: 0.45–1.35; p < 0.00 and b = 1.32; CI: 0.18–2.47; p = 0.025, respectively). Clients “psychosocial communication was not related to midwives” clientdirected gaze. Additionally, psychosocial communication by clients was directly, positively related to the counseling duration (b = 0.59; CI: 0.20–099; p = 0.004).
Conclusions
In contrast with our expectations, midwives’ client-directed gaze was not related with psychosocial communication of clients. Practice implications: In addition to asking psychosocial questions, our study shows that midwives’ affective behavior and counseling duration is likely to encourage client’s psychosocial communication, known to be especially important for facilitating decision-making. (aut. ref.)
This study focuses on facilitation of clients’ psychosocial communication during prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly screening. We assessed how psychosocial communication by clients is related to midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Methods
During 184 videotaped prenatal counseling consultations with 20 Dutch midwives, verbal psychosocial and affective behavior was measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). We rated the duration of client-directed gaze. We performed multilevel analyses to assess the relation between clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Results
Clients’ psychosocial communication was higher if midwives’ asked more psychosocial questions and showed more affective behavior (b = 0.90; CI: 0.45–1.35; p < 0.00 and b = 1.32; CI: 0.18–2.47; p = 0.025, respectively). Clients “psychosocial communication was not related to midwives” clientdirected gaze. Additionally, psychosocial communication by clients was directly, positively related to the counseling duration (b = 0.59; CI: 0.20–099; p = 0.004).
Conclusions
In contrast with our expectations, midwives’ client-directed gaze was not related with psychosocial communication of clients. Practice implications: In addition to asking psychosocial questions, our study shows that midwives’ affective behavior and counseling duration is likely to encourage client’s psychosocial communication, known to be especially important for facilitating decision-making. (aut. ref.)
Objectives
This study focuses on facilitation of clients’ psychosocial communication during prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly screening. We assessed how psychosocial communication by clients is related to midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Methods
During 184 videotaped prenatal counseling consultations with 20 Dutch midwives, verbal psychosocial and affective behavior was measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). We rated the duration of client-directed gaze. We performed multilevel analyses to assess the relation between clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Results
Clients’ psychosocial communication was higher if midwives’ asked more psychosocial questions and showed more affective behavior (b = 0.90; CI: 0.45–1.35; p < 0.00 and b = 1.32; CI: 0.18–2.47; p = 0.025, respectively). Clients “psychosocial communication was not related to midwives” clientdirected gaze. Additionally, psychosocial communication by clients was directly, positively related to the counseling duration (b = 0.59; CI: 0.20–099; p = 0.004).
Conclusions
In contrast with our expectations, midwives’ client-directed gaze was not related with psychosocial communication of clients. Practice implications: In addition to asking psychosocial questions, our study shows that midwives’ affective behavior and counseling duration is likely to encourage client’s psychosocial communication, known to be especially important for facilitating decision-making. (aut. ref.)
This study focuses on facilitation of clients’ psychosocial communication during prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly screening. We assessed how psychosocial communication by clients is related to midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Methods
During 184 videotaped prenatal counseling consultations with 20 Dutch midwives, verbal psychosocial and affective behavior was measured by the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). We rated the duration of client-directed gaze. We performed multilevel analyses to assess the relation between clients’ psychosocial communication and midwives’ psychosocial and affective communication, client-directed gaze and counseling duration.
Results
Clients’ psychosocial communication was higher if midwives’ asked more psychosocial questions and showed more affective behavior (b = 0.90; CI: 0.45–1.35; p < 0.00 and b = 1.32; CI: 0.18–2.47; p = 0.025, respectively). Clients “psychosocial communication was not related to midwives” clientdirected gaze. Additionally, psychosocial communication by clients was directly, positively related to the counseling duration (b = 0.59; CI: 0.20–099; p = 0.004).
Conclusions
In contrast with our expectations, midwives’ client-directed gaze was not related with psychosocial communication of clients. Practice implications: In addition to asking psychosocial questions, our study shows that midwives’ affective behavior and counseling duration is likely to encourage client’s psychosocial communication, known to be especially important for facilitating decision-making. (aut. ref.)