Publicatie
Publicatie datum
Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.
Penders, Y.W.H., Block, L. van den, Donker, G.A., Deliens, L., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. Comparison of end-of-life care for older people living at home and in residential homes: a mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands. British Journal of General Practice: 2015, 65(640), p. e724-e730.
Download de PDF
Background
The proportion of older people is increasing, therefore their place of residence and place of care at the end of life are becoming increasingly important.
Aim
To compare aspects of end-of-life care among older people in residential homes and home settings in the Netherlands.
Design and setting
Nationwide representative mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.
Method
The study included patients aged ≥65 years who died non-suddenly, whose longest place of residence in their last year of life was at home or in a residential home (n = 498). Differences were analysed using Pearson’s χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Controlling for the differences between the populations in home settings and residential homes, no differences were found in treatment goals, communication about end-of-life care, or use of specialised palliative care between the two settings. However, people living in a residential home were more likely to have received palliative care from a GP than people living at home (OR 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 5.07). In residential homes, people more often experienced no transfer between care settings (OR 2.76, 95% CI = 1.35 to 5.63) and no hospitalisations (OR 2.2, 95% CI = 1.04 to 4.67) in the last 3 months of life, and died in hospital less often (OR 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.97) than those people living at home.
Conclusion
Despite similar treatment goals, care in residential homes seems more successful in avoiding transfers and hospitalisation at the end of life. Especially since older people are encouraged to stay at home longer, measures should be taken to ensure they are not at higher risk of transfers and hospitalisations in this setting. (aut. ref.)
The proportion of older people is increasing, therefore their place of residence and place of care at the end of life are becoming increasingly important.
Aim
To compare aspects of end-of-life care among older people in residential homes and home settings in the Netherlands.
Design and setting
Nationwide representative mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.
Method
The study included patients aged ≥65 years who died non-suddenly, whose longest place of residence in their last year of life was at home or in a residential home (n = 498). Differences were analysed using Pearson’s χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Controlling for the differences between the populations in home settings and residential homes, no differences were found in treatment goals, communication about end-of-life care, or use of specialised palliative care between the two settings. However, people living in a residential home were more likely to have received palliative care from a GP than people living at home (OR 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 5.07). In residential homes, people more often experienced no transfer between care settings (OR 2.76, 95% CI = 1.35 to 5.63) and no hospitalisations (OR 2.2, 95% CI = 1.04 to 4.67) in the last 3 months of life, and died in hospital less often (OR 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.97) than those people living at home.
Conclusion
Despite similar treatment goals, care in residential homes seems more successful in avoiding transfers and hospitalisation at the end of life. Especially since older people are encouraged to stay at home longer, measures should be taken to ensure they are not at higher risk of transfers and hospitalisations in this setting. (aut. ref.)
Background
The proportion of older people is increasing, therefore their place of residence and place of care at the end of life are becoming increasingly important.
Aim
To compare aspects of end-of-life care among older people in residential homes and home settings in the Netherlands.
Design and setting
Nationwide representative mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.
Method
The study included patients aged ≥65 years who died non-suddenly, whose longest place of residence in their last year of life was at home or in a residential home (n = 498). Differences were analysed using Pearson’s χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Controlling for the differences between the populations in home settings and residential homes, no differences were found in treatment goals, communication about end-of-life care, or use of specialised palliative care between the two settings. However, people living in a residential home were more likely to have received palliative care from a GP than people living at home (OR 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 5.07). In residential homes, people more often experienced no transfer between care settings (OR 2.76, 95% CI = 1.35 to 5.63) and no hospitalisations (OR 2.2, 95% CI = 1.04 to 4.67) in the last 3 months of life, and died in hospital less often (OR 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.97) than those people living at home.
Conclusion
Despite similar treatment goals, care in residential homes seems more successful in avoiding transfers and hospitalisation at the end of life. Especially since older people are encouraged to stay at home longer, measures should be taken to ensure they are not at higher risk of transfers and hospitalisations in this setting. (aut. ref.)
The proportion of older people is increasing, therefore their place of residence and place of care at the end of life are becoming increasingly important.
Aim
To compare aspects of end-of-life care among older people in residential homes and home settings in the Netherlands.
Design and setting
Nationwide representative mortality follow-back study among GPs in the Netherlands.
Method
The study included patients aged ≥65 years who died non-suddenly, whose longest place of residence in their last year of life was at home or in a residential home (n = 498). Differences were analysed using Pearson’s χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results
Controlling for the differences between the populations in home settings and residential homes, no differences were found in treatment goals, communication about end-of-life care, or use of specialised palliative care between the two settings. However, people living in a residential home were more likely to have received palliative care from a GP than people living at home (OR 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 5.07). In residential homes, people more often experienced no transfer between care settings (OR 2.76, 95% CI = 1.35 to 5.63) and no hospitalisations (OR 2.2, 95% CI = 1.04 to 4.67) in the last 3 months of life, and died in hospital less often (OR 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.97) than those people living at home.
Conclusion
Despite similar treatment goals, care in residential homes seems more successful in avoiding transfers and hospitalisation at the end of life. Especially since older people are encouraged to stay at home longer, measures should be taken to ensure they are not at higher risk of transfers and hospitalisations in this setting. (aut. ref.)
Gegevensverzameling