Publicatie
Publicatie datum
Measuring disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: a validation study of an observational method.
Heugten, C.M. van, Dekker, J., Deelman, B.G., Dijk, A.J. van, Stehmann-Saris, F.C., Kinebanian, A. Measuring disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia: a validation study of an observational method. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: 2000, 10(4), 401-414
Lees online
The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical and construct validity of the assessment of disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia. Disabilities were assessed by means of observation of activities of daily living (ADL), such as washing the face and upper body and putting on a blouse or shirt. The study was carried out at occupational therapy departments in general hospitals, rehabilitation centres, and nursing homes. Patients diagnosed to have had a stroke in the left hemishpere and to have apraxia participated in the study (n=45, 21 males, 24 females age 39-91). Guidelines were offered for the ADL observations and the assessment of disabilities in these activities. Clinical validity was investigated by comparing the scores of the patients with those of a group of stroke patients without apraxia (n=36, 14 males, 22 females age 35-88). Construct validity was examined by investigating relationships between several measures of interest: an apraxia test, a motor functioning test, a set of ADL observations, and the Barthel index as a general measure of disability. Comparison of the results of the patients with apraxia with the control group of stroke patients without apraxia showed that the clinical validity of the ADL observations is good: on the basis of the ADL observations, differences between patients with apraxia and patients without apraxia are measured. Correlation analyses of the group of patients with apraxia showed that the ADL observations were highly associated with apraxia, but only to a lesser degree with motor impairments; while motor impairments correlated strongly with the Barthel index (a general measure of physical disability), but only marginally with ADL observations. A LISREL analysis supported these findings. The results indicate that ADL observations have clinical validity and that the construct validity of the observational method is good. ADL observations appear to measure disabilities caused by apraxia in stroke patients. (aut.ref.)
The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical and construct validity of the assessment of disabilities in stroke patients with apraxia. Disabilities were assessed by means of observation of activities of daily living (ADL), such as washing the face and upper body and putting on a blouse or shirt. The study was carried out at occupational therapy departments in general hospitals, rehabilitation centres, and nursing homes. Patients diagnosed to have had a stroke in the left hemishpere and to have apraxia participated in the study (n=45, 21 males, 24 females age 39-91). Guidelines were offered for the ADL observations and the assessment of disabilities in these activities. Clinical validity was investigated by comparing the scores of the patients with those of a group of stroke patients without apraxia (n=36, 14 males, 22 females age 35-88). Construct validity was examined by investigating relationships between several measures of interest: an apraxia test, a motor functioning test, a set of ADL observations, and the Barthel index as a general measure of disability. Comparison of the results of the patients with apraxia with the control group of stroke patients without apraxia showed that the clinical validity of the ADL observations is good: on the basis of the ADL observations, differences between patients with apraxia and patients without apraxia are measured. Correlation analyses of the group of patients with apraxia showed that the ADL observations were highly associated with apraxia, but only to a lesser degree with motor impairments; while motor impairments correlated strongly with the Barthel index (a general measure of physical disability), but only marginally with ADL observations. A LISREL analysis supported these findings. The results indicate that ADL observations have clinical validity and that the construct validity of the observational method is good. ADL observations appear to measure disabilities caused by apraxia in stroke patients. (aut.ref.)